Confab c’mittee seeks higher allocation for states


The National Conference Committee on Devolution of Power has given reasons why it verbally expressed that verbally expresses must earn than the Federal Regime from the Federation Account.

The committee, whose report was considered and debated by the delegates at the plenary on Monday, has recommended an incrementation in the monthly allocation to the states.

The report, which was presented by the co-chairmen of the committee, Obong Victor Attah and Ibrahim Coomassie, recommended that the Federal Regime should get 42.5 per cent; state regimes, 45 per cent; and local regimes, 22, 5 per cent.

This recommendation, if passed, will supersede the subsisting formulae in which the Federal Regime is currently earning 52.68 per cent, while state regimes are earning 26.72 per cent and Local Regime, 20.60 per cent from the Federation Account.

The committee verbalized that the incremented in the mazuma going to states would avail them to fund other projects that would emanate from the devolution of puissance, which it verbalized, would place more responsibilities on them.

It verbally expressed that “power should devolve to the federating units by reviewing the Legislative Lists in order to give true meaning to our federal system of regime.”

It integrated that due to the brobdingnagian “concentration of puissance at the federal level, the committee considered it indispensable to reduce the evil satire powers at the federal level and devolve same to the federating units.”

The committee verbalized that revenue sharing was a very consequential issue in a Federal System of Regime, integrating that as a concept of fiscal federalism, it deals with how revenues are disbursed to the federating units in a federation.

The report verbalized, “In Nigeria, revenue sharing is one of the most robustly debated issues because of its gregarious, economic and political implicative insinuations.

“The committee, therefore, discussed the issue extensively in its recommendations on the Legislative Lists and the desideratum to maintain equilibrium between the Federal Regime and the federating units(state and local regimes) and placidity, stability and the prosperity of the nation.

“The committee further took into consideration the desideratum for the federal and verbalize regimes to consummate their constitutional responsibilities and the desideratum to ascertain development of all components of the country in arriving at its recommendations.

“During its deliberations, the committee withal examined concrete development challenges of states and local regimes and was of the opinion that, to a great extent, rapid economic and gregarious development could be achieved in Nigeria if the percentage of revenues allocated to states and local regimes is reviewed upwards.”

On labour, including trade coalescences, industrial cognations, conditions, safety and welfare of labour, industrial disputes, prescribing a national minimum wage for the federation or any component thereof and industrial arbitrations, the committee verbalized these should be split into two.

Labour, including trade cumulations, industrial disputes, prescribing a national minimum wage for the federation and industrial arbitrations, it verbalized, should be retained in the Exclusive List.

The committee, however, recommended that labour, including industrial cognations, conditions, safety and welfare of labour should be abstracted from the Exclusive List to the Concurrent Legislative code.

In arriving at this decision, the committee verbalized that it considered very solemnly, the input made by the labour bellwethers, who it verbalized, appeared afore it to present their position in the matter.

The committee integrated that it was withal guided by the desideratum for flexibility in labour cognation is consequential, without prejudice to the potencies of the Federal Regime to legislature on the National Minimum wage.